↓ Skip to main content

The guard cell metabolome: functions in stomatal movement and global food security

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The guard cell metabolome: functions in stomatal movement and global food security
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00334
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biswapriya B. Misra, Biswa R. Acharya, David Granot, Sarah M. Assmann, Sixue Chen

Abstract

Guard cells represent a unique single cell-type system for the study of cellular responses to abiotic and biotic perturbations that affect stomatal movement. Decades of effort through both classical physiological and functional genomics approaches have generated an enormous amount of information on the roles of individual metabolites in stomatal guard cell function and physiology. Recent application of metabolomics methods has produced a substantial amount of new information on metabolome control of stomatal movement. In conjunction with other "omics" approaches, the knowledge-base is growing to reach a systems-level description of this single cell-type. Here we summarize current knowledge of the guard cell metabolome and highlight critical metabolites that bear significant impact on future engineering and breeding efforts to generate plants/crops that are resistant to environmental challenges and produce high yield and quality products for food and energy security.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor 9 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 17%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,333,503
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#10,809
of 20,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,602
of 266,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#149
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,080 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.