↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the plant-pathogen interactions in the context of proteomics-generated apoplastic proteins inventory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the plant-pathogen interactions in the context of proteomics-generated apoplastic proteins inventory
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ravi Gupta, So Eui Lee, Ganesh K. Agrawal, Randeep Rakwal, Sangryeol Park, Yiming Wang, Sun T. Kim

Abstract

The extracellular space between cell wall and plasma membrane acts as the first battle field between plants and pathogens. Bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes that colonize the living plant tissues are encased in this narrow region in the initial step of infection. Therefore, the apoplastic region is believed to be an interface which mediates the first crosstalk between host and pathogen. The secreted proteins and other metabolites, derived from both host and pathogen, interact in this apoplastic region and govern the final relationship between them. Hence, investigation of protein secretion and apoplastic interaction could provide a better understanding of plant-microbe interaction. Here, we are briefly discussing the methods available for the isolation and normalization of the apoplastic proteins, as well as the current state of secretome studies focused on the in-planta interaction between the host and the pathogen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 24%
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 18%
Chemistry 5 2%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 53 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,813,552
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,228
of 20,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,077
of 267,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#116
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,087 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.