↓ Skip to main content

Species specific and environment induced variation of δ13C and δ15N in alpine plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species specific and environment induced variation of δ13C and δ15N in alpine plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Yang, Rolf T. W. Siegwolf, Christian Körner

Abstract

Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope signals in plant tissues integrate plant-environment interactions over long periods. In this study, we hypothesized that humid alpine life conditions are narrowing the scope for significant deviations from common carbon, water and nitrogen relations as captured by stable isotope signals. We explored the variation in δ(13)C and δ(15)N in 32 plant species from tissue type to ecosystem scale across a suite of locations at c. Two thousand five hundred meter elevation in the Swiss Alps. Foliar δ(13)C and δ(15)N varied among species by about 3-4‰ and 7-8‰ respectively. However, there was no overall difference in means of δ(13)C and δ(15)N for species sampled in different plant communities or when bulk plant dry matter harvests of different plant communities were compared. δ(13)C was found to be highly species specific, so that the ranking among species was mostly maintained across 11 habitats. However, δ(15)N varied significantly from place to place in all species (a range of 2.7‰) except in Fabaceae (Trifolium alpinum) and Juncaceae (Luzula lutea). There was also a substantial variation among individuals of the same species collected next to each other. No difference was found in foliar δ(15)N of non-legumes, which were either collected next to or away from the most common legume, T. alpinum. δ(15)N data place Cyperaceae and Juncaceae, just like Fabaceae, in a low discrimination category, well separated from other families. Soil δ(15)N was higher than in plants and increased with soil depth. The results indicate a high functional diversity in alpine plants that is similar to that reported for low elevation plants. We conclude that the surprisingly high variation in δ(13)C and δ(15)N signals in the studied high elevation plants is largely species specific (genetic) and insensitive to obvious environmental cues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 44%
Environmental Science 16 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#19,714
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,664
of 280,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#214
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.