↓ Skip to main content

Development and regulation of pedicel abscission in tomato

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and regulation of pedicel abscission in tomato
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuhiro Ito, Toshitsugu Nakano

Abstract

To shed unfertilized flowers or ripe fruits, many plant species develop a pedicel abscission zone (AZ), a specialized tissue that develops between the organ and the main body of the plant. Regulation of pedicel abscission is an important agricultural concern because pre-harvest abscission can reduce yields of fruit or grain crops, such as apples, rice, wheat, etc. Tomato has been studied as a model system for abscission, as tomato plants develop a distinct AZ at the midpoint of the pedicel and several tomato mutants, such as jointless, have pedicels that lack an AZ. This mini-review focuses on recent advances in research on the mechanisms regulating tomato pedicel abscission. Molecular genetic studies revealed that three MADS-box transcription factors interactively play a central role in pedicel AZ development. Transcriptome analyses identified activities involved in abscission and also found novel transcription factors that may regulate AZ activities. Another study identified transcription factors mediating abscission pathways from induction signals to activation of cell wall hydrolysis. These recent findings in tomato will enable significant advances in understanding the regulation of abscission in other key agronomic species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 111 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Master 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 18%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,645
of 24,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,162
of 280,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#94
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.