You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The quest for tolerant varieties: the importance of integrating “omics” techniques to phenotyping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00448 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michel Zivy, Stefanie Wienkoop, Jenny Renaut, Carla Pinheiro, Estelle Goulas, Sebastien Carpentier |
| Abstract |
The primary objective of crop breeding is to improve yield and/or harvest quality while minimizing inputs. Global climate change and the increase in world population are significant challenges for agriculture and call for further improvements to crops and the development of new tools for research. Significant progress has been made in the molecular and genetic analysis of model plants. However, is science generating false expectations? Are 'omic techniques generating valuable information that can be translated into the field? The exploration of crop biodiversity and the correlation of cellular responses to stress tolerance at the plant level is currently a challenge. This viewpoint reviews concisely the problems one encounters when working on a crop and provides an outline of possible workflows when initiating cellular phenotyping via "-omic" techniques (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Norway | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,593,209
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,829
of 21,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,125
of 263,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#49
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.