You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional redundancy of necrotrophic effectors – consequences for exploitation for breeding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00501 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kar-Chun Tan, Huyen T. T. Phan, Kasia Rybak, Evan John, Yit H. Chooi, Peter S. Solomon, Richard P. Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 29% |
Researcher | 12 | 19% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 61% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,091,708
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,866
of 20,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,120
of 262,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#64
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.