↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liliana Quiza, Marc St-Arnaud, Etienne Yergeau

Abstract

The goal of microbiome engineering is to manipulate the microbiome toward a certain type of community that will optimize plant functions of interest. For instance, in crop production the goal is to reduce disease susceptibility, increase nutrient availability increase abiotic stress tolerance and increase crop yields. Various approaches can be devised to engineer the plant-microbiome, but one particularly promising approach is to take advantage of naturally evolved plant-microbiome communication channels. This is, however, very challenging as the understanding of the plant-microbiome communication is still mostly rudimentary and plant-microbiome interactions varies between crops species (and even cultivars), between individual members of the microbiome and with environmental conditions. In each individual case, many aspects of the plant-microorganisms relationship should be thoroughly scrutinized. In this article we summarize some of the existing plant-microbiome engineering studies and point out potential avenues for further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 370 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 21%
Researcher 73 19%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 60 16%
Unknown 61 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 198 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 10%
Environmental Science 26 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 4%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 71 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,373,196
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,913
of 21,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,244
of 263,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#59
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.