↓ Skip to main content

How to let go: pectin and plant cell adhesion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to let go: pectin and plant cell adhesion
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Firas Bou Daher, Siobhan A. Braybrook

Abstract

Plant cells do not, in general, migrate. They maintain a fixed position relative to their neighbors, intimately linked through growth and differentiation. The mediator of this connection, the pectin-rich middle lamella, is deposited during cell division and maintained throughout the cell's life to protect tissue integrity. The maintenance of adhesion requires cell wall modification and is dependent on the actin cytoskeleton. There are developmental processes that require cell separation, such as organ abscission, dehiscence, and ripening. In these instances, the pectin-rich middle lamella must be actively altered to allow cell separation, a process which also requires cell wall modification. In this review, we will focus on the role of pectin and its modification in cell adhesion and separation. Recent insights gained in pectin gel mechanics will be discussed in relation to existing knowledge of pectin chemistry as it relates to cell adhesion. As a whole, we hope to begin defining the physical mechanisms behind a cells' ability to hang on, and how it lets go.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 325 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 24%
Researcher 44 13%
Student > Master 44 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 76 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 17%
Engineering 18 5%
Chemistry 7 2%
Chemical Engineering 5 1%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 92 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,405,651
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,687
of 20,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,242
of 263,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#53
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.