↓ Skip to main content

Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
464 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00619
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matiur Rahaman, Dijun Chen, Zeeshan Gillani, Christian Klukas, Ming Chen

Abstract

Due to an increase in the consumption of food, feed, fuel and to meet global food security needs for the rapidly growing human population, there is a necessity to breed high yielding crops that can adapt to the future climate changes, particularly in developing countries. To solve these global challenges, novel approaches are required to identify quantitative phenotypes and to explain the genetic basis of agriculturally important traits. These advances will facilitate the screening of germplasm with high performance characteristics in resource-limited environments. Recently, plant phenomics has offered and integrated a suite of new technologies, and we are on a path to improve the description of complex plant phenotypes. High-throughput phenotyping platforms have also been developed that capture phenotype data from plants in a non-destructive manner. In this review, we discuss recent developments of high-throughput plant phenotyping infrastructure including imaging techniques and corresponding principles for phenotype data analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 455 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 19%
Researcher 90 19%
Student > Master 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 62 13%
Unknown 83 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 220 47%
Engineering 38 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 7%
Computer Science 27 6%
Environmental Science 13 3%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 100 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,234,315
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,151
of 20,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,395
of 264,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#103
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.