↓ Skip to main content

The role of chromatin modifications in somatic embryogenesis in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of chromatin modifications in somatic embryogenesis in plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00635
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clelia De-la-Peña, Geovanny I. Nic-Can, Rosa M. Galaz-Ávalos, Randy Avilez-Montalvo, Víctor M. Loyola-Vargas

Abstract

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is a powerful tool for plant genetic improvement when used in combination with traditional agricultural techniques, and it is also an important technique to understand the different processes that occur during the development of plant embryogenesis. SE onset depends on a complex network of interactions among plant growth regulators, mainly auxins and cytokinins, during the proembryogenic early stages, and ethylene and gibberellic and abscisic acids later in the development of the somatic embryos. These growth regulators control spatial and temporal regulation of multiple genes in order to initiate change in the genetic program of somatic cells, as well as moderating the transition between embryo developmental stages. In recent years, epigenetic mechanisms have emerged as critical factors during SE. Some early reports indicate that auxins and in vitro conditions modify the levels of DNA methylation in embryogenic cells. The changes in DNA methylation patterns are associated with the regulation of several genes involved in SE, such as WUS, BBM1, LEC, and several others. In this review, we highlight the more recent discoveries in the understanding of the role of epigenetic regulation of SE. In addition, we include a survey of different approaches to the study of SE, and new opportunities to focus SE studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 23%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 35 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,146,485
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,504
of 21,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,858
of 267,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#172
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.