↓ Skip to main content

Circadian regulation of abiotic stress tolerance in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circadian regulation of abiotic stress tolerance in plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00648
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack Grundy, Claire Stoker, Isabelle A. Carré

Abstract

Extremes of temperatures, drought and salinity cause widespread crop losses throughout the world and impose severe limitations on the amount of land that can be used for agricultural purposes. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop crops that perform better under such abiotic stress conditions. Here, we discuss intriguing, recent evidence that circadian clock contributes to plants' ability to tolerate different types of environmental stress, and to acclimate to them. The clock controls expression of a large fraction of abiotic stress-responsive genes, as well as biosynthesis and signaling downstream of stress response hormones. Conversely, abiotic stress results in altered expression and differential splicing of the clock genes, leading to altered oscillations of downstream stress-response pathways. We propose a range of mechanisms by which this intimate coupling between the circadian clock and environmental stress-response pathways may contribute to plant growth and survival under abiotic stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 264 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 22%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 55 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 21%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Mathematics 2 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 60 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,963,279
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,738
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,499
of 278,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#30
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.