↓ Skip to main content

Natural variation in cross-talk between glucosinolates and onset of flowering in Arabidopsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural variation in cross-talk between glucosinolates and onset of flowering in Arabidopsis
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00697
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lea M. Jensen, Henriette S. K. Jepsen, Barbara A. Halkier, Daniel J. Kliebenstein, Meike Burow

Abstract

Naturally variable regulatory networks control different biological processes including reproduction and defense. This variation within regulatory networks enables plants to optimize defense and reproduction in different environments. In this study we investigate the ability of two enzyme-encoding genes in the glucosinolate pathway, AOP2 and AOP3, to affect glucosinolate accumulation and flowering time. We have introduced the two highly similar enzymes into two different AOP (null) accessions, Col-0 and Cph-0, and found that the genes differ in their ability to affect glucosinolate levels and flowering time across the accessions. This indicated that the different glucosinolates produced by AOP2 and AOP3 serve specific regulatory roles in controlling these phenotypes. While the changes in glucosinolate levels were similar in both accessions, the effect on flowering time was dependent on the genetic background pointing to natural variation in cross-talk between defense chemistry and onset of flowering. This variation likely reflects an adaptation to survival in different environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 19%
Chemistry 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,982,150
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,019
of 23,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,464
of 272,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#59
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.