You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Capturing spiral radial growth of conifers using the superellipse to model tree-ring geometric shape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.00856 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pei-Jian Shi, Jian-Guo Huang, Cang Hui, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, Jacques C. Tardif, Li-Hong Zhai, Fu-Sheng Wang, Bai-Lian Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
| Norway | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 19% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,394,041
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,072
of 24,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,912
of 287,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#83
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.