↓ Skip to main content

Species coexistence in a changing world

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species coexistence in a changing world
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00866
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Valladares, Cristina C. Bastias, Oscar Godoy, Elena Granda, Adrián Escudero

Abstract

The consequences of global change for the maintenance of species diversity will depend on the sum of each species responses to the environment and on the interactions among them. A wide ecological literature supports that these species-specific responses can arise from factors related to life strategies, evolutionary history and intraspecific variation, and also from environmental variation in space and time. In the light of recent advances from coexistence theory combined with mechanistic explanations of diversity maintenance, we discuss how global change drivers can influence species coexistence. We revise the importance of both competition and facilitation for understanding coexistence in different ecosystems, address the influence of phylogenetic relatedness, functional traits, phenotypic plasticity and intraspecific variability, and discuss lessons learnt from invasion ecology. While most previous studies have focused their efforts on disentangling the mechanisms that maintain the biological diversity in species-rich ecosystems such as tropical forests, grasslands and coral reefs, we argue that much can be learnt from pauci-specific communities where functional variability within each species, together with demographic and stochastic processes becomes key to understand species interactions and eventually community responses to global change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Taiwan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 488 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 24%
Researcher 73 15%
Student > Master 64 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 9%
Student > Bachelor 36 7%
Other 74 15%
Unknown 89 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 226 45%
Environmental Science 127 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Physics and Astronomy 5 <1%
Other 21 4%
Unknown 103 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,775,656
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,015
of 20,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,150
of 279,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#195
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.