↓ Skip to main content

Beyond conservation agriculture

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
742 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond conservation agriculture
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00870
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken E. Giller, Jens A. Andersson, Marc Corbeels, John Kirkegaard, David Mortensen, Olaf Erenstein, Bernard Vanlauwe

Abstract

Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil and water conservation led to widespread adoption of CA, particularly on large farms in the Americas and Australia, where farmers harness the tools of modern science: highly-sophisticated machines, potent agrochemicals, and biotechnology. Over the past 10 years CA has been promoted among smallholder farmers in the (sub-) tropics, often with disappointing results. Growing evidence challenges the claims that CA increases crop yields and builds-up soil carbon although increased stability of crop yields in dry climates is evident. Our analyses suggest pragmatic adoption on larger mechanized farms, and limited uptake of CA by smallholder farmers in developing countries. We propose a rigorous, context-sensitive approach based on Systems Agronomy to analyze and explore sustainable intensification options, including the potential of CA. There is an urgent need to move beyond dogma and prescriptive approaches to provide soil and crop management options for farmers to enable the Sustainable Intensification of agriculture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 742 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 731 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 132 18%
Researcher 131 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 15%
Student > Bachelor 55 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 4%
Other 103 14%
Unknown 175 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 292 39%
Environmental Science 96 13%
Social Sciences 25 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 3%
Engineering 22 3%
Other 68 9%
Unknown 217 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,166,455
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#320
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,253
of 297,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.