↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular peptidases of the cereal pathogen Fusarium graminearum

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular peptidases of the cereal pathogen Fusarium graminearum
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00962
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rohan G. T. Lowe, Owen McCorkelle, Mark Bleackley, Christine Collins, Pierre Faou, Suresh Mathivanan, Marilyn Anderson

Abstract

The plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum (Fgr) creates economic and health risks in cereals agriculture. Fgr causes head blight (or scab) of wheat and stalk rot of corn, reducing yield, degrading grain quality, and polluting downstream food products with mycotoxins. Fungal plant pathogens must secrete proteases to access nutrition and to breakdown the structural protein component of the plant cell wall. Research into the proteolytic activity of Fgr is hindered by the complex nature of the suite of proteases secreted. We used a systems biology approach comprising genome analysis, transcriptomics and label-free quantitative proteomics to characterize the peptidases deployed by Fgr during growth. A combined analysis of published microarray transcriptome datasets revealed seven transcriptional groupings of peptidases based on in vitro growth, in planta growth, and sporulation behaviors. A high resolution mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis defined the extracellular proteases secreted by F. graminearum. A meta-classification based on sequence characters and transcriptional/translational activity in planta and in vitro provides a platform to develop control strategies that target Fgr peptidases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 25%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 21%
Engineering 3 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,224,255
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,775
of 21,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,955
of 286,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#78
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.