↓ Skip to main content

Ferns: the missing link in shoot evolution and development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ferns: the missing link in shoot evolution and development
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew R. G. Plackett, Verónica S. Di Stilio, Jane A. Langdale

Abstract

Shoot development in land plants is a remarkably complex process that gives rise to an extreme diversity of forms. Our current understanding of shoot developmental mechanisms comes almost entirely from studies of angiosperms (flowering plants), the most recently diverged plant lineage. Shoot development in angiosperms is based around a layered multicellular apical meristem that produces lateral organs and/or secondary meristems from populations of founder cells at its periphery. In contrast, non-seed plant shoots develop from either single apical initials or from a small population of morphologically distinct apical cells. Although developmental and molecular information is becoming available for non-flowering plants, such as the model moss Physcomitrella patens, making valid comparisons between highly divergent lineages is extremely challenging. As sister group to the seed plants, the monilophytes (ferns and relatives) represent an excellent phylogenetic midpoint of comparison for unlocking the evolution of shoot developmental mechanisms, and recent technical advances have finally made transgenic analysis possible in the emerging model fern Ceratopteris richardii. This review compares and contrasts our current understanding of shoot development in different land plant lineages with the aim of highlighting the potential role that the fern C. richardii could play in shedding light on the evolution of underlying genetic regulatory mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 22%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,387,295
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,689
of 24,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,132
of 297,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#23
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,688 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.