↓ Skip to main content

Elevated Temperature Differentially Influences Effector-Triggered Immunity Outputs in Arabidopsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elevated Temperature Differentially Influences Effector-Triggered Immunity Outputs in Arabidopsis
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00995
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Menna, Dang Nguyen, David S. Guttman, Darrell Desveaux

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 28%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,991
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,544
of 299,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#119
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.