↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of a Novel Starch Synthase in Maize

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of a Novel Starch Synthase in Maize
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.01013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanmei Liu, Guiling Yu, Bin Wei, Yongbin Wang, Junjie Zhang, Yufeng Hu, Yinghong Liu, Guowu Yu, Huaiyu Zhang, Yubi Huang

Abstract

Starch is an important reserve of carbon and energy in plants, providing the majority of calories in the human diet and animal feed. Its synthesis is orchestrated by several key enzymes, and the amount and structure of starch, affecting crop yield and quality, are determined mainly by starch synthase (SS) activity. To date, five SS isoforms, including SSI-IV and Granule Bound Starch Synthase (GBSS) have been identified and their physiological functions have been well characterized. Here, we report the identification of a new SS isoform in maize, designated SSV. By searching sequenced genomes, SSV has been found in all green plants with conserved sequences and gene structures. Our phylogenetic analysis based on 780 base pairs has suggested that SSIV and SSV resulted from a gene duplication event, which may have occurred before the algae formation. An expression profile analysis of SSV in maize has indicated that ZmSSV is mainly transcribed in the kernel and ear leaf during the grain filling stage, which is partly similar to other SS isoforms. Therefore, it is likely that SSV may play an important role in starch biosynthesis. Subsequent analysis of SSV function may facilitate understanding the mechanism of starch granules formation, number and structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,915
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,749
of 20,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,564
of 386,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#240
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.