↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Tools in Pea Breeding Programs: Status and Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic Tools in Pea Breeding Programs: Status and Perspectives
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.01037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadim Tayeh, Grégoire Aubert, Marie-Laure Pilet-Nayel, Isabelle Lejeune-Hénaut, Thomas D. Warkentin, Judith Burstin

Abstract

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is an annual cool-season legume and one of the oldest domesticated crops. Dry pea seeds contain 22-25% protein, complex starch and fiber constituents, and a rich array of vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals which make them a valuable source for human consumption and livestock feed. Dry pea ranks third to common bean and chickpea as the most widely grown pulse in the world with more than 11 million tons produced in 2013. Pea breeding has achieved great success since the time of Mendel's experiments in the mid-1800s. However, several traits still require significant improvement for better yield stability in a larger growing area. Key breeding objectives in pea include improving biotic and abiotic stress resistance and enhancing yield components and seed quality. Taking advantage of the diversity present in the pea genepool, many mapping populations have been constructed in the last decades and efforts have been deployed to identify loci involved in the control of target traits and further introgress them into elite breeding materials. Pea now benefits from next-generation sequencing and high-throughput genotyping technologies that are paving the way for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection approaches. This review covers the significant development and deployment of genomic tools for pea breeding in recent years. Future prospects are discussed especially in light of current progress toward deciphering the pea genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 17%
Psychology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,265,943
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,085
of 24,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,745
of 390,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#34
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.