↓ Skip to main content

Structure and Function of Centromeric and Pericentromeric Heterochromatin in Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure and Function of Centromeric and Pericentromeric Heterochromatin in Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.01049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauriane Simon, Maxime Voisin, Christophe Tatout, Aline V. Probst

Abstract

The centromere is a specific chromosomal region where the kinetochore assembles to ensure the faithful segregation of sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Centromeres are defined by a local enrichment of the specific histone variant CenH3 mostly at repetitive satellite sequences. A larger pericentromeric region containing repetitive sequences and transposable elements surrounds the centromere that adopts a particular chromatin state characterized by specific histone variants and post-translational modifications and forms a transcriptionally repressive chromosomal environment. In the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana centromeric and pericentromeric domains form conspicuous heterochromatin clusters called chromocenters in interphase. Here we discuss, using Arabidopsis as example, recent insight into mechanisms involved in maintenance and establishment of centromeric and pericentromeric chromatin signatures as well as in chromocenter formation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
Czechia 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Researcher 37 22%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,101,117
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,870
of 20,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,669
of 387,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#86
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.