↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiological and Evolutionary Outcomes in Gene-for-Gene and Matching Allele Models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiological and Evolutionary Outcomes in Gene-for-Gene and Matching Allele Models
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.01084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter H. Thrall, Luke G. Barrett, Peter N. Dodds, Jeremy J. Burdon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,310,838
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,835
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,536
of 403,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#34
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.