↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of Root-Associated Bacterial Communities Along a Salt-Marsh Primary Succession

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution of Root-Associated Bacterial Communities Along a Salt-Marsh Primary Succession
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.01188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miao Wang, Pu Yang, Joana Falcão Salles

Abstract

Proper quantification of the relative influence of soil and plant host on the root-associated microbiome can only be achieved by studying its distribution along an environmental gradient. Here, we used an undisturbed salt marsh chronosequence to study the bacterial communities associated with the soil, rhizosphere and the root endopshere of Limonium vulgare using 454-pyrosequencing. We hypothesize that the selective force exerted by plants rather than soil would regulate the dynamics of the root-associated bacterial assembly along the chronosequence. Our results showed that the soil and rhizosphere bacterial communities were phylogenetically more diverse than those in the endosphere. Moreover, the diversity of the rhizosphere microbiome followed the increased complexity of the abiotic and biotic factors during succession while remaining constant in the other microbiomes. Multivariate analyses showed that the rhizosphere and soil-associated communities clustered by successional stages, whereas the endosphere communities were dispersed. Interestingly, the endosphere microbiome showed higher turnover, while the bulk and rhizosphere soil microbiomes became more similar at the end of the succession. Overall, we showed that soil characteristics exerted an overriding influence on the rhizosphere microbiome, although plant effect led to a clear diversity pattern along the succession. Conversely, the endosphere microbiome was barely affected by any of the environmental measurements and very distinct from other communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Other 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 50%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Chemistry 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,707,852
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,389
of 23,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,859
of 404,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#142
of 457 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,806 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 457 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.