Title |
Endosomal Interactions during Root Hair Growth
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2015.01262 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel von Wangenheim, Amparo Rosero, George Komis, Olga Šamajová, Miroslav Ovečka, Boris Voigt, Jozef Šamaj |
Abstract |
The dynamic localization of endosomal compartments labeled with targeted fluorescent protein tags is routinely followed by time lapse fluorescence microscopy approaches and single particle tracking algorithms. In this way trajectories of individual endosomes can be mapped and linked to physiological processes as cell growth. However, other aspects of dynamic behavior including endosomal interactions are difficult to follow in this manner. Therefore, we characterized the localization and dynamic properties of early and late endosomes throughout the entire course of root hair formation by means of spinning disc time lapse imaging and post-acquisition automated multitracking and quantitative analysis. Our results show differential motile behavior of early and late endosomes and interactions of late endosomes that may be specified to particular root hair domains. Detailed data analysis revealed a particular transient interaction between late endosomes-termed herein as dancing-endosomes-which is not concluding to vesicular fusion. Endosomes preferentially located in the root hair tip interacted as dancing-endosomes and traveled short distances during this interaction. Finally, sizes of early and late endosomes were addressed by means of super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM) to corroborate measurements on the spinning disc. This is a first study providing quantitative microscopic data on dynamic spatio-temporal interactions of endosomes during root hair tip growth. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 23% |
Germany | 4 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
Scientists | 10 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 22% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |