You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Genomics and Effectomics of the Crop Killer Xanthomonas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2016.00071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Denancé, Thomas Lahaye, Laurent D. Noël |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,148,903
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,988
of 24,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,752
of 405,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#69
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.