↓ Skip to main content

How Phytohormones Shape Interactions between Plants and the Soil-Borne Fungus Fusarium oxysporum

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Phytohormones Shape Interactions between Plants and the Soil-Borne Fungus Fusarium oxysporum
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaotang Di, Frank L. W. Takken, Nico Tintor

Abstract

Plants interact with a huge variety of soil microbes, ranging from pathogenic to mutualistic. The Fusarium oxysporum (Fo) species complex consists of ubiquitous soil inhabiting fungi that can infect and cause disease in over 120 different plant species including tomato, banana, cotton, and Arabidopsis. However, in many cases Fo colonization remains symptomless or even has beneficial effects on plant growth and/or stress tolerance. Also in pathogenic interactions a lengthy asymptomatic phase usually precedes disease development. All this indicates a sophisticated and fine-tuned interaction between Fo and its host. The molecular mechanisms underlying this balance are poorly understood. Plant hormone signaling networks emerge as key regulators of plant-microbe interactions in general. In this review we summarize the effects of the major phytohormones on the interaction between Fo and its diverse hosts. Generally, Salicylic Acid (SA) signaling reduces plant susceptibility, whereas Jasmonic Acid (JA), Ethylene (ET), Abscisic Acid (ABA), and auxin have complex effects, and are potentially hijacked by Fo for host manipulation. Finally, we discuss how plant hormones and Fo effectors balance the interaction from beneficial to pathogenic and vice versa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 239 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 20%
Student > Master 37 15%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 55 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 11%
Chemistry 6 2%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 62 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,455,370
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,673
of 20,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,825
of 297,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#139
of 508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.