↓ Skip to main content

RNA Interference for Functional Genomics and Improvement of Cotton (Gossypium sp.)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNA Interference for Functional Genomics and Improvement of Cotton (Gossypium sp.)
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibrokhim Y. Abdurakhmonov, Mirzakamol S. Ayubov, Khurshida A. Ubaydullaeva, Zabardast T. Buriev, Shukhrat E. Shermatov, Haydarali S. Ruziboev, Umid M. Shapulatov, Sukumar Saha, Mauricio Ulloa, John Z. Yu, Richard G. Percy, Eric J. Devor, Govind C. Sharma, Venkateswara R. Sripathi, Siva P. Kumpatla, Alexander van der Krol, Hake D. Kater, Khakimdjan Khamidov, Shavkat I. Salikhov, Johnie N. Jenkins, Abdusattor Abdukarimov, Alan E. Pepper

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi), is a powerful new technology in the discovery of genetic sequence functions, and has become a valuable tool for functional genomics of cotton (Gossypium sp.). The rapid adoption of RNAi has replaced previous antisense technology. RNAi has aided in the discovery of function and biological roles of many key cotton genes involved in fiber development, fertility and somatic embryogenesis, resistance to important biotic and abiotic stresses, and oil and seed quality improvements as well as the key agronomic traits including yield and maturity. Here, we have comparatively reviewed seminal research efforts in previously used antisense approaches and currently applied breakthrough RNAi studies in cotton, analyzing developed RNAi methodologies, achievements, limitations, and future needs in functional characterizations of cotton genes. We also highlighted needed efforts in the development of RNAi-based cotton cultivars, and their safety and risk assessment, small and large-scale field trials, and commercialization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Chemistry 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,681,114
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,639
of 21,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,630
of 299,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#133
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.