↓ Skip to main content

Tackling Unwanted Proteolysis in Plant Production Hosts Used for Molecular Farming

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tackling Unwanted Proteolysis in Plant Production Hosts Used for Molecular Farming
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manoj K. Mandal, Houtan Ahvari, Stefan Schillberg, Andreas Schiermeyer

Abstract

Although the field of molecular farming has significantly matured over the last years, some obstacles still need to be resolved. A major limiting factor for a broader application of plant hosts for the production of valuable recombinant proteins is the low yield of intact recombinant proteins. These low yields are at least in part due to the action of endogenous plant proteases on the foreign recombinant proteins. This mini review will present the current knowledge of the proteolytic enzymes involved in the degradation of different target proteins and strategies that are applied to suppress undesirable proteolytic activities in order to safeguard recombinant proteins during the production process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,577,025
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,733
of 20,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,602
of 299,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#41
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.