↓ Skip to main content

Potential Biotechnological Strategies for the Cleanup of Heavy Metals and Metalloids

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential Biotechnological Strategies for the Cleanup of Heavy Metals and Metalloids
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kareem A. Mosa, Ismail Saadoun, Kundan Kumar, Mohamed Helmy, Om Parkash Dhankher

Abstract

Global mechanization, urbanization, and various natural processes have led to the increased release of toxic compounds into the biosphere. These hazardous toxic pollutants include a variety of organic and inorganic compounds, which pose a serious threat to the ecosystem. The contamination of soil and water are the major environmental concerns in the present scenario. This leads to a greater need for remediation of contaminated soils and water with suitable approaches and mechanisms. The conventional remediation of contaminated sites commonly involves the physical removal of contaminants, and their disposition. Physical remediation strategies are expensive, non-specific and often make the soil unsuitable for agriculture and other uses by disturbing the microenvironment. Owing to these concerns, there has been increased interest in eco-friendly and sustainable approaches such as bioremediation, phytoremediation and rhizoremediation for the cleanup of contaminated sites. This review lays particular emphasis on biotechnological approaches and strategies for heavy metal and metalloid containment removal from the environment, highlighting the advances and implications of bioremediation and phytoremediation as well as their utilization in cleaning-up toxic pollutants from contaminated environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 509 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 13%
Student > Bachelor 67 13%
Student > Master 61 12%
Researcher 55 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 83 16%
Unknown 155 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 15%
Environmental Science 60 12%
Chemistry 21 4%
Engineering 17 3%
Other 49 10%
Unknown 177 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,848,590
of 24,153,435 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,866
of 22,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,451
of 304,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#65
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,153,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.