You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cuticle Structure in Relation to Chemical Composition: Re-assessing the Prevailing Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2016.00427 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Fernández, Paula Guzmán-Delgado, José Graça, Sara Santos, Luis Gil |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 19% |
| Researcher | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 14% |
| Engineering | 13 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,085,336
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#303
of 20,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,552
of 301,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.