↓ Skip to main content

Response and Tolerance Mechanism of Cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. to Elevated Temperature Stress: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response and Tolerance Mechanism of Cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. to Elevated Temperature Stress: A Review
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00937
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kashif Rafiq Zahid, Farhan Ali, Farooq Shah, Muhammad Younas, Tariq Shah, Durri Shahwar, Waseem Hassan, Zahoor Ahmad, Chao Qi, Yanli Lu, Amjad Iqbal, Wei Wu

Abstract

Cotton is an important multipurpose crop which is highly sensitive to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Proper management of this cash crop requires systematic understanding of various environmental conditions that are vital to yield and quality. High temperature stress can severely affect the viability of pollens and anther indehiscence, which leads to significant yield losses. Cotton can respond to withstand adverse environmental condition in several phases among which the accumulation of chemicals is extremely vital. Calcium, kinases, reactive oxygen species, carbohydrate, transcription factors, gene expression regulation, and plant hormones signaling pathways are playing a handy role in activating the major genes responsible to encounter and defend elevated temperature stress. The production of heat shock proteins is up-regulated when crops are unleashed to high temperature stress. Molecular breeding can play a functional role to identify superior genes for all the important attributes as well as provide breeder ready markers for developing ideotypes. The development of high-temperature resistant transgenic cultivars of cotton can grant a stability benefit and can also ameliorate the production capacity in response to elevated temperature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 33 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Unspecified 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 41 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,335,423
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,165
of 20,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,561
of 351,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#405
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.