↓ Skip to main content

Neuroprotective Activity of Hypericum perforatum and Its Major Components

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroprotective Activity of Hypericum perforatum and Its Major Components
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana I. Oliveira, Cláudia Pinho, Bruno Sarmento, Alberto C. P. Dias

Abstract

Hypericum perforatum is a perennial plant, with worldwide distribution, commonly known as St. John's wort. It has been used for centuries in traditional medicine for the treatment of several disorders, such as minor burns, anxiety, and mild to moderate depression. In the past years, its antidepressant properties have been extensively studied. Despite that, other H. perforatum biological activities, as its neuroprotective properties have also been evaluated. The present review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the main biologically active compounds of H. perforatum, as for its chemistry, pharmacological activities, drug interactions and adverse reactions and gather scattered information about its neuroprotective abilities. As for this, it has been demonstrated that H. perforatum extracts and several of its major molecular components have the ability to protect against toxic insults, either directly, through neuroprotective mechanisms, or indirectly, through is antioxidant properties. H. perforatum has therefore the potential to become an effective neuroprotective therapeutic agent, despite further studies that need to be carried out.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 19%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Lecturer 9 5%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 63 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 72 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,955,341
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,801
of 24,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,100
of 371,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#85
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.