↓ Skip to main content

A Direct Comparison of Remote Sensing Approaches for High-Throughput Phenotyping in Plant Breeding

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Direct Comparison of Remote Sensing Approaches for High-Throughput Phenotyping in Plant Breeding
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Tattaris, Matthew P. Reynolds, Scott C. Chapman

Abstract

Remote sensing (RS) of plant canopies permits non-intrusive, high-throughput monitoring of plant physiological characteristics. This study compared three RS approaches using a low flying UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle), with that of proximal sensing, and satellite-based imagery. Two physiological traits were considered, canopy temperature (CT) and a vegetation index (NDVI), to determine the most viable approaches for large scale crop genetic improvement. The UAV-based platform achieves plot-level resolution while measuring several hundred plots in one mission via high-resolution thermal and multispectral imagery measured at altitudes of 30-100 m. The satellite measures multispectral imagery from an altitude of 770 km. Information was compared with proximal measurements using IR thermometers and an NDVI sensor at a distance of 0.5-1 m above plots. For robust comparisons, CT and NDVI were assessed on panels of elite cultivars under irrigated and drought conditions, in different thermal regimes, and on un-adapted genetic resources under water deficit. Correlations between airborne data and yield/biomass at maturity were generally higher than equivalent proximal correlations. NDVI was derived from high-resolution satellite imagery for only larger sized plots (8.5 × 2.4 m) due to restricted pixel density. Results support use of UAV-based RS techniques for high-throughput phenotyping for both precision and efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 359 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 18%
Student > Master 62 17%
Researcher 56 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 93 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 45%
Engineering 21 6%
Environmental Science 20 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 112 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,608,068
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,197
of 20,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,008
of 367,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#26
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.