↓ Skip to main content

The Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi to Improve Strawberry Production in Coir Substrate

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi to Improve Strawberry Production in Coir Substrate
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louisa Robinson Boyer, Wei Feng, Natallia Gulbis, Klara Hajdu, Richard J. Harrison, Peter Jeffries, Xiangming Xu

Abstract

Strawberry is an important fruit crop within the UK. To reduce the impact of soil-borne diseases and extend the production season, more than half of the UK strawberry production is now in substrate (predominantly coir) under protection. Substrates such as coir are usually depleted of microbes including arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and consequently the introduction of beneficial microbes is likely to benefit commercial cropping systems. Inoculating strawberry plants in substrate other than coir has been shown to increase plants tolerance to soil-borne pathogens and water stress. We carried out studies to investigate whether AMF could improve strawberry production in coir under low nitrogen input and regulated deficit irrigation. Application of AMF led to an appreciable increase in the size and number of class I fruit, especially under either deficient irrigation or low nitrogen input condition. However, root length colonization by AMF was reduced in strawberry grown in coir compared to soil and Terragreen. Furthermore, the appearance of AMF colonizing strawberry and maize roots grown in coir showed some physical differences from the structure in colonized roots in soil and Terragreen: the colonization structure appeared to be more compact and smaller in coir.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Unspecified 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 31 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,153,406
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,329
of 20,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,608
of 343,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#62
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.