You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Auxin and Cytokinin Phytohormones Modulate Root Microbe Interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2016.01240 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stéphane Boivin, Camille Fonouni-Farde, Florian Frugier |
| Abstract |
A large range of microorganisms can associate with plants, resulting in neutral, friendly or hostile interactions. The ability of plants to recognize compatible and incompatible microorganisms and to limit or promote their colonization is therefore crucial for their survival. Elaborated communication networks determine the degree of association between the host plant and the invading microorganism. Central to these regulations of plant microbe interactions, phytohormones modulate microorganism plant associations and coordinate cellular and metabolic responses associated to the progression of microorganisms across different plant tissues. We review here hormonal regulations, focusing on auxin and cytokinin phytohormones, involved in the interactions between plant roots and soil microorganisms, including bacterial and fungi associations, either beneficial (symbiotic) or detrimental (pathogenic). The aim is to highlight similarities and differences in cytokinin/auxin functions amongst various compatible versus incompatible associations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 53% |
| Scientists | 16 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 21% |
| Researcher | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,743,591
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#595
of 24,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,283
of 355,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.