↓ Skip to main content

Monte Carlo Modeling of Photon Propagation Reveals Highly Scattering Coral Tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monte Carlo Modeling of Photon Propagation Reveals Highly Scattering Coral Tissue
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Wangpraseurt, Steven L. Jacques, Tracy Petrie, Michael Kühl

Abstract

Corals are very efficient at using solar radiation, with photosynthetic quantum efficiencies approaching theoretical limits. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms underlying such outstanding photosynthetic performance through extracting inherent optical properties of the living coral tissue and skeleton in a massive faviid coral. Using Monte Carlo simulations developed for medical tissue optics it is shown that for the investigated faviid coral, the coral tissue was a strongly light scattering matrix with a reduced scattering coefficient of μs' = 10 cm(-1) (at 636 nm). In contrast, the scattering coefficient of the coral skeleton was μs' = 3.4 cm(-1), which facilitated the efficient propagation of light to otherwise shaded coral tissue layers, thus supporting photosynthesis in lower tissues. Our study provides a quantification of coral tissue optical properties in a massive faviid coral and suggests a novel light harvesting strategy, where tissue and skeletal optics act in concert to optimize the illumination of the photosynthesizing algal symbionts embedded within the living coral tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 24%
Physics and Astronomy 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,327,502
of 25,046,944 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,263
of 24,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,445
of 327,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#51
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,944 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.