↓ Skip to main content

Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
45 X users
patent
19 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2408 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2495 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharada P. Mohanty, David P. Hughes, Marcel Salathé

Abstract

Crop diseases are a major threat to food security, but their rapid identification remains difficult in many parts of the world due to the lack of the necessary infrastructure. The combination of increasing global smartphone penetration and recent advances in computer vision made possible by deep learning has paved the way for smartphone-assisted disease diagnosis. Using a public dataset of 54,306 images of diseased and healthy plant leaves collected under controlled conditions, we train a deep convolutional neural network to identify 14 crop species and 26 diseases (or absence thereof). The trained model achieves an accuracy of 99.35% on a held-out test set, demonstrating the feasibility of this approach. Overall, the approach of training deep learning models on increasingly large and publicly available image datasets presents a clear path toward smartphone-assisted crop disease diagnosis on a massive global scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 2489 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 335 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 288 12%
Student > Bachelor 214 9%
Researcher 195 8%
Lecturer 76 3%
Other 370 15%
Unknown 1017 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 605 24%
Engineering 313 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 246 10%
Unspecified 43 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 1%
Other 172 7%
Unknown 1086 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#599,241
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#134
of 24,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,334
of 329,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4
of 422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,889 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.