↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Enabled Prediction Models for Yield Related Traits in Chickpea

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Enabled Prediction Models for Yield Related Traits in Chickpea
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manish Roorkiwal, Abhishek Rathore, Roma R. Das, Muneendra K. Singh, Ankit Jain, Samineni Srinivasan, Pooran M. Gaur, Bharadwaj Chellapilla, Shailesh Tripathi, Yongle Li, John M. Hickey, Aaron Lorenz, Tim Sutton, Jose Crossa, Jean-Luc Jannink, Rajeev K. Varshney

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) unlike marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) predicts breeding values of lines using genome-wide marker profiling and allows selection of lines prior to field-phenotyping, thereby shortening the breeding cycle. A collection of 320 elite breeding lines was selected and phenotyped extensively for yield and yield related traits at two different locations (Delhi and Patancheru, India) during the crop seasons 2011-12 and 2012-13 under rainfed and irrigated conditions. In parallel, these lines were also genotyped using DArTseq platform to generate genotyping data for 3000 polymorphic markers. Phenotyping and genotyping data were used with six statistical GS models to estimate the prediction accuracies. GS models were tested for four yield related traits viz. seed yield, 100 seed weight, days to 50% flowering and days to maturity. Prediction accuracy for the models tested varied from 0.138 (seed yield) to 0.912 (100 seed weight), whereas performance of models did not show any significant difference for estimating prediction accuracy within traits. Kinship matrix calculated using genotyping data reaffirmed existence of two different groups within selected lines. There was not much effect of population structure on prediction accuracy. In brief, present study establishes the necessary resources for deployment of GS in chickpea breeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 107 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Professor 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Computer Science 3 3%
Mathematics 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,636,045
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,789
of 20,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,850
of 415,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#38
of 469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.