You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Single R Gene Introgression Lines for Accurate Dissection of the Brassica - Leptosphaeria Pathosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2016.01771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas J. Larkan, Fengqun Yu, Derek J. Lydiate, S. Roger Rimmer, M. Hossein Borhan |
| Abstract |
Seven blackleg resistance (R) genes (Rlm1, Rlm2, Rlm3, Rlm4, LepR1, LepR2 & LepR3) were each introgressed into a common susceptible B. napus doubled-haploid (DH) line through reciprocal back-crossing, producing single-R gene introgression lines (ILs) for use in the pathological and molecular study of Brassica-Leptosphaeria interactions. The genomic positions of the R genes were defined through molecular mapping and analysis with transgenic L. maculans isolates was used to confirm the identity of the introgressed genes where possible. Using L. maculans isolates of contrasting avirulence gene (Avr) profiles, we preformed extensive differential pathology for phenotypic comparison of the ILs to other B. napus varieties, demonstrating the ILs can provide for the accurate assessment of Avr-R gene interactions by avoiding non-Avr dependant alterations to resistance responses which can occur in some commonly used B. napus varieties. Whole-genome SNP-based assessment allowed us to define the donor parent introgressions in each IL and provide a strong basis for comparative molecular dissection of the pathosystem. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,825,561
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,542
of 22,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,662
of 424,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#50
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.