↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Yield and Drought Using Active and Passive Spectral Sensing Systems at the Reproductive Stage in Wheat
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00379
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Becker, Urs Schmidhalter

Abstract

Active and passive sensors are available for ground-based, high-throughput phenotyping in the field. However, these sensor systems have seldom been compared with respect to their determination of plant water status and water use efficiency related parameters under drought conditions. In this study, five passive and active reflectance sensors, including a hyperspectral passive sensor, an active flash sensor (AFS), the Crop Circle, and the GreenSeeker, were evaluated to assess drought-related destructive and non-destructive morphophysiological parameters (ground cover, relative leaf water content, leaf temperature, and carbon isotope discrimination of leaves and grain) and grain yield of twenty wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Measurements were conducted in a 2-year study, including a drought stress and a control environment under field conditions. A comparison of the active sensors at the heading, anthesis and grain-filling stages indicated that the Crop Circle provided the most significant and robust relationships with drought-related parameters (relative leaf water content and leaf and grain carbon isotope discrimination). In comparison with the passive sensor, the five water and normalized water indices (WI and NWI-1 to 4), which are only provided by the passive sensor, showed the strongest relationships with the drought stress-related parameters (r = -0.49 to -0.86) and grain yield (r = -0.88) at anthesis. This paper indicates that precision phenotyping allows the integration of water indices in breeding programs to rapidly and cost-effectively identify drought-tolerant genotypes. This is supported by the fact that grain yield and the water indices showed the same heritability under drought conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 51%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,546,001
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,715
of 20,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,903
of 308,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#211
of 535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.