↓ Skip to main content

Bioactivity in Rhododendron: A Systemic Analysis of Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities and Their Phylogenetic and Phytochemical Origins

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioactivity in Rhododendron: A Systemic Analysis of Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities and Their Phylogenetic and Phytochemical Origins
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Grimbs, Abhinandan Shrestha, Ahmed S. D. Rezk, Sergio Grimbs, Inamullah Hakeem Said, Hartwig Schepker, Marc-Thorsten Hütt, Dirk C. Albach, Klaudia Brix, Nikolai Kuhnert, Matthias S. Ullrich

Abstract

The exceptional diversity of the genus Rhododendron has a strong potential for identification, characterization, and production of bioactive lead compounds for health purposes. A particularly relevant field of application is the search for new antibiotics. Here, we present a comparative analysis of nearly 90 Rhododendron species targeted toward the search for such candidate substances. Through a combination of phytochemical profiles with antimicrobial susceptibility and cytotoxicity, complemented by phylogenetic analyses, we identify seven potentially antimicrobial active but non-cytotoxic compounds in terms of mass-to-charge ratios and retention times. Exemplary bioactivity-guided fractionation for a promising Rhododendron species experimentally supports in fact one of these candidate lead compounds. By combining categorical correlation analysis with Boolean operations, we have been able to investigate the origin of bioactive effects in further detail. Intriguingly, we discovered clear indications of systems effects (synergistic interactions and functional redundancies of compounds) in the manifestation of antimicrobial activities in this plant genus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Chemistry 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,901,066
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,431
of 20,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,738
of 310,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#45
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.