↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the Polycomb-Group Mark H3K27me3 in Unicellular Algae

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of the Polycomb-Group Mark H3K27me3 in Unicellular Algae
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawel Mikulski, Olga Komarynets, Fabio Fachinelli, Andreas P.M. Weber, Daniel Schubert

Abstract

Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins mediate chromatin repression in plants and animals by catalyzing H3K27 methylation and H2AK118/119 mono-ubiquitination through the activity of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and PRC1, respectively. PcG proteins were extensively studied in higher plants, but their function and target genes in unicellular branches of the green lineage remain largely unknown. To shed light on PcG function and modus operandi in a broad evolutionary context, we demonstrate phylogenetic relationship of core PRC1 and PRC2 proteins and H3K27me3 biochemical presence in several unicellular algae of different phylogenetic subclades. We focus then on one of the species, the model red alga Cyanidioschizon merolae, and show that H3K27me3 occupies both, genes and repetitive elements, and mediates the strength of repression depending on the differential occupancy over gene bodies. Furthermore, we report that H3K27me3 in C. merolae is enriched in telomeric and subtelomeric regions of the chromosomes and has unique preferential binding toward intein-containing genes involved in protein splicing. Thus, our study gives important insight for Polycomb-mediated repression in lower eukaryotes, uncovering a previously unknown link between H3K27me3 targets and protein splicing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 27%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,490,417
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,508
of 20,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,600
of 309,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#495
of 584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,631 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.