↓ Skip to main content

Grape Composition under Abiotic Constrains: Water Stress and Salinity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Grape Composition under Abiotic Constrains: Water Stress and Salinity
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00851
Pubmed ID
Authors

José M Mirás-Avalos, Diego S Intrigliolo

Abstract

Water stress and increasing soil salt concentration represent the most common abiotic constrains that exert a negative impact on Mediterranean vineyards performance. However, several studies have proven that deficit irrigation strategies are able to improve grape composition. In contrast, irrigation with saline waters negatively affected yield and grape composition, although the magnitude of these effects depended on the cultivar, rootstock, phenological stage when water was applied, as well as on the salt concentration in the irrigation water. In this context, agronomic practices that minimize these effects on berry composition and, consequently, on wine quality must be achieved. In this paper, we briefly reviewed the main findings obtained regarding the effects of deficit irrigation strategies, as well as irrigation with saline water, on the berry composition of both red and white cultivars, as well as on the final wine. A meta-analysis was performed using published data for red and white varieties; a general liner model accounting for the effects of cultivar, rootstock, and midday stem water potential was able to explain up to 90% of the variability in the dataset, depending on the selected variable. In both red and white cultivars, berry weight, must titratable acidity and pH were fairly well simulated, whereas the goodness-of-fit for wine attributes was better for white cultivars.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 52%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 51 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,314
of 20,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,210
of 316,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#509
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.