You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Borage Extracts As Potential Biostimulant Using a Phenomic, Agronomic, Physiological, and Biochemical Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.00935 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberta Bulgari, Silvia Morgutti, Giacomo Cocetta, Noemi Negrini, Stefano Farris, Aldo Calcante, Anna Spinardi, Enrico Ferrari, Ilaria Mignani, Roberto Oberti, Antonio Ferrante |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,146,886
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,009
of 24,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,141
of 333,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#111
of 595 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 595 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.