↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Two New Mechanisms That Regulate Fruit Growth by Cell Expansion in Tomato

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Two New Mechanisms That Regulate Fruit Growth by Cell Expansion in Tomato
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.00988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constance Musseau, Daniel Just, Joana Jorly, Frédéric Gévaudant, Annick Moing, Christian Chevalier, Martine Lemaire-Chamley, Christophe Rothan, Lucie Fernandez

Abstract

Key mechanisms controlling fruit weight and shape at the levels of meristem, ovary or very young fruit have already been identified using natural tomato diversity. We reasoned that new developmental modules prominent at later stages of fruit growth could be discovered by using new genetic and phenotypic diversity generated by saturated mutagenesis. Twelve fruit weight and tissue morphology mutants likely affected in late fruit growth were selected among thousands of fruit size and shape EMS mutants available in our tomato EMS mutant collection. Their thorough characterization at organ, tissue and cellular levels revealed two major clusters controlling fruit growth and tissue morphogenesis either through (i) the growth of all fruit tissues through isotropic cell expansion or (ii) only the growth of the pericarp through anisotropic cell expansion. These likely correspond to new cell expansion modules controlling fruit growth and tissue morphogenesis in tomato. Our study therefore opens the way for the identification of new gene regulatory networks controlling tomato fruit growth and morphology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Unspecified 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,969,513
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,012
of 20,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,552
of 317,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#65
of 579 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 579 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.