↓ Skip to main content

The Journey of Arsenic from Soil to Grain in Rice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Journey of Arsenic from Soil to Grain in Rice
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Surabhi Awasthi, Reshu Chauhan, Sudhakar Srivastava, Rudra D. Tripathi

Abstract

Arsenic (As) is a non-essential toxic metalloid whose elevated concentration in rice grains is a serious issue both for rice yield and quality, and for human health. The rice-As interactions, hence, have been studied extensively in past few decades. A deep understanding of factors influencing As uptake and transport from soil to grains can be helpful to tackle this issue so as to minimize grain As levels. As uptake at the root surface by rice plants depends on factors like iron plaque and radial oxygen loss. There is involvement of a number of transporters viz., phosphate transporters and aquaglyceroporins in the uptake and transport of different As species and in the movement to subcellular compartments. These processes are also affected by sulfur availability and consequently on the level of thiol (-SH)-containing As binding peptides viz., glutathione (GSH) and phytochelatins (PCs). Further, the role of phloem in As movement to the grains is also suggested. This review presents a detailed map of journey of As from soil to the grains. The implications for the utilization of available knowledge in minimizing As in rice grains are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Student > Master 32 15%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 61 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 27%
Environmental Science 27 12%
Chemistry 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 75 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,324,744
of 23,943,619 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#403
of 22,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,517
of 319,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,943,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.