You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sugarcane Water Stress Tolerance Mechanisms and Its Implications on Developing Biotechnology Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.01077 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thais H. S. Ferreira, Max S. Tsunada, Denis Bassi, Pedro Araújo, Lucia Mattiello, Giovanna V. Guidelli, Germanna L. Righetto, Vanessa R. Gonçalves, Prakash Lakshmanan, Marcelo Menossi |
| Abstract |
Sugarcane is a unique crop with the ability to accumulate high levels of sugar and is a commercially viable source of biomass for bioelectricity and second-generation bioethanol. Water deficit is the single largest abiotic stress affecting sugarcane productivity and the development of water use efficient and drought tolerant cultivars is an imperative for all major sugarcane producing countries. This review summarizes the physiological and molecular studies on water deficit stress in sugarcane, with the aim to help formulate more effective research strategies for advancing our knowledge on genes and mechanisms underpinning plant response to water stress. We also overview transgenic studies in sugarcane, with an emphasis on the potential strategies to develop superior sugarcane varieties that improve crop productivity in drought-prone environments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 254 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 83 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 97 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,454,100
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,104
of 20,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,908
of 316,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#44
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.