↓ Skip to main content

Applicability of a “Multi-Stage Pulse Labeling” 15N Approach to Phenotype N Dynamics in Maize Plant Components during the Growing Season

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applicability of a “Multi-Stage Pulse Labeling” 15N Approach to Phenotype N Dynamics in Maize Plant Components during the Growing Season
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda de Oliveira Silva, James J. Camberato, Tristan Coram, Timothy Filley, Tony J. Vyn

Abstract

Highlights This work utilizes "multi-stage pulse labeling" (15)N applications, primarily during reproductive growth stages, as a phenotyping strategy to identify maize hybrids with superior N use efficiency (NUE) under low N conditions. Research using labeled isotopic N ((15)N) can precisely quantify fertilizer nitrogen (N) uptake and organ-specific N allocation in field crops such as maize (Zea mays L.). The overall research objective was to study plant N uptake patterns potentially correlated with N use efficiency (NUE) in field-grown maize hybrids using a "multi-stage pulse labeling" (15)N phenotyping strategy with an emphasis on the reproductive period. Five hybrids varying in NUE were compared under zero N fertilizer application (0N) plus a moderate rate of 112 kg N ha(-1) (112N) in 2013 (2 locations) and 2014 growing seasons. The equivalent of 3.2 (2013) to 2.1 (2014) kg of (15)N ha(-1), as labeled Ca((15)NO3)2, was injected into soil on both sides of consecutive plants at multiple stages between V14 and R5. Aboveground plant biomass was primarily collected in short-term intervals (4-6 days after each (15)N application) in both years, and following a single long-term interval (at R6 after (15)N injection at R1) in 2014. Averaged across hybrids and site-years, the moderate N rate (112N) increased absolute (15)N uptake at all stages; however, plants in the 0N treatment allocated proportionally more (15)N to reproductive organs. Before flowering, short-term recovery of (15)N ((15)Nrec) totaled ~0.30 or 0.40 kg kg(-1) of the (15)N applied, and ~50% of that accumulated (15)Nu was found in leaves and 40% in stems. After flowering, plant (15)Nrec totaled ~0.30 kg kg(-1) of (15)N applied, and an average 30% of accumulated (15)Nu was present in leaves, 17% in stems, and the remainder-usually the majority-in ears. At the R5 stage, despite a declining overall rate of (15)N uptake per GDD thermal unit, plant (15)Nrec represented ~0.25 kg kg(-1) of (15)N applied, of which ~65% was allocated to kernels. Overall long-term (15)Nrec during grain filling was ~0.45 and 0.70 kg kg(-1) of total (15)N applied at R1 with 0 and 112N, respectively, and most (~77%) (15)N uptake was found in kernels. The "multi-stage pulse labeling" technique proved to be a robust phenotyping strategy to differentiate reproductive-stage N uptake/allocation patterns to plant organs and maize efficiencies with newly available fertilizer N.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 56%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,885,170
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#725
of 20,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,976
of 317,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#22
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.