↓ Skip to main content

Multilevel Regulation of Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multilevel Regulation of Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01564
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C. Haak, Takeshi Fukao, Ruth Grene, Zhihua Hua, Rumen Ivanov, Giorgio Perrella, Song Li

Abstract

The sessile lifestyle of plants requires them to cope with stresses in situ. Plants overcome abiotic stresses by altering structure/morphology, and in some extreme conditions, by compressing the life cycle to survive the stresses in the form of seeds. Genetic and molecular studies have uncovered complex regulatory processes that coordinate stress adaptation and tolerance in plants, which are integrated at various levels. Investigating natural variation in stress responses has provided important insights into the evolutionary processes that shape the integrated regulation of adaptation and tolerance. This review primarily focuses on the current understanding of how transcriptional, post-transcriptional, post-translational, and epigenetic processes along with genetic variation orchestrate stress responses in plants. We also discuss the current and future development of computational tools to identify biologically meaningful factors from high dimensional, genome-scale data and construct the signaling networks consisting of these components.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 21%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Master 17 7%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 58 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 21%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 69 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,428,911
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,090
of 20,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,553
of 318,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#25
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.