↓ Skip to main content

Potassium in the Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Berry: Transport and Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potassium in the Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Berry: Transport and Function
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzy Y. Rogiers, Zelmari A. Coetzee, Rob R. Walker, Alain Deloire, Stephen D. Tyerman

Abstract

K(+) is the most abundant cation in the grape berry. Here we focus on the most recent information in the long distance transport and partitioning of K(+) within the grapevine and postulate on the potential role of K(+) in berry sugar accumulation, berry water relations, cellular growth, disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance and mitigating senescence. By integrating information from several different plant systems we have been able to generate new hypotheses on the integral functions of this predominant cation and to improve our understanding of how these functions contribute to grape berry growth and ripening. Valuable contributions to the study of K(+) in membrane stabilization, turgor maintenance and phloem transport have allowed us to propose a mechanistic model for the role of this cation in grape berry development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor 7 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 69 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,198,936
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,708
of 21,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,709
of 321,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#247
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.